|
GraciousCall.org - Handbook on Faith, Hope, and Love
<<
Contents
>>
Handbook on Faith, Hope, and Love by Saint Augustine
CHAPTER
V. The Kinds and Degrees of Error
16. This being the case, when that verse of Maro's gives us pleasure,
"Happy is he who can understand the causes of things," [28]
it still does not follow that our felicity depends upon our knowing the causes
of the great physical processes in the world, which are hidden in the secret
maze of nature,
"Whence earthquakes, whose force swells the sea to flood,
so that they burst their bounds and then subside again," [29]
and other such things as this.
But we ought to know the causes of good and evil in things, at least as far as
men may do so in this life, filled as it is with errors and distress, in order
to avoid these errors and distresses. We must always aim at that true felicity
wherein misery does not distract, nor error mislead. If it is a good thing to
understand the causes of physical motion, there is nothing of greater concern
in these matters which we ought to understand than our own health. But when we
are in ignorance of such things, we seek out a physician, who has seen how the
secrets of heaven and earth still remain hidden from us, and what patience
there must be in unknowing.
17. Although we should beware of error wherever possible, not only in great
matters but in small ones as well, it is impossible not to be ignorant of many
things. Yet it does not follow that one falls into error out of ignorance
alone. If someone thinks he knows what he does not know, if he approves as true
what is actually false, this then is error, in the proper sense of the term.
Obviously, much depends on the question involved in the error, for in one and
the same question one naturally prefers the instructed to the ignorant, the
expert to the blunderer, and this with good reason. In a complex issue,
however, as when one man knows one thing and another man knows something else,
if the former knowledge is more useful and the latter is less useful or even
harmful, who in this latter case would not prefer ignorance? There are some
things, after all, that it is better not to know than to know. Likewise, there
is sometimes profit in error--but on a journey, not in morals.[30]
This sort of thing happened to us
once, when we mistook the way at a crossroads and did not go by the place where
an armed gang of Donatists lay in wait to ambush us. We finally arrived at the
place where we were going, but only by a roundabout way, and upon learning of
the ambush, we were glad to have erred and gave thanks to God for our error.
Who would doubt, in such a situation, that the erring traveler is better off
than the unerring brigand? This perhaps explains the meaning of our finest
poet, when he speaks for an unhappy lover:
"When I saw [her] I was undone,
and fatal error swept me away," [31]
for there is such a thing as a fortunate mistake which not only does no harm
but actually does some good.
But now for a more careful consideration of the truth in this business. To err
means nothing more than to judge as true what is in fact false, and as false
what is true. It means to be certain about the uncertain, uncertain about the
certain, whether it be certainly true or certainly false. This sort of error in
the mind is deforming and improper, since the fitting and proper thing would be
to be able to say, in speech or judgment: "Yes, yes. No, no."[32]
Actually, the wretched lives we lead
come partly from this: that sometimes if they are not to be entirely lost,
error is unavoidable. It is different in that higher life where Truth itself is
the life of our souls, where none deceives and none is deceived. In this life
men deceive and are deceived, and are actually worse off when they deceive by
lying than when they are deceived by believing lies. Yet our rational mind
shrinks from falsehood, and naturally avoids error as much as it can, so that
even a deceiver is unwilling to be deceived by somebody else.[33]
For the liar thinks he does not
deceive himself and that he deceives only those who believe him. Indeed, he
does not err in his lying, if he himself knows what the truth is. But he is
deceived in this, that he supposes that his lie does no harm to himself, when
actually every sin harms the one who commits it more that it does the one who
suffers it.
<<
Contents
>>
|