|
GraciousCall.org - Calvin's Commentary on Genesis
<<
Top
Contents
>>
CHAPTER 48.
|
Genesis 48:1-22
|
|
1 And it came to pass after these things, that (one)
told Joseph, Behold, thy father (is) sick: and he took with him his
two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim.
|
1
Et fuit post haec dictum fuit ipsi Joseph, Ecce, pater tuus
aegrotat: tunc accepit duos filios suos secum, Menasseh et Ephriam.
|
|
2 And (one) told Jacob, and said, Behold,
thy son Joseph cometh unto thee: and Israel strengthened himself, and sat
upon the bed.
|
1
Et nuntiavit ipsi Jahacob, et dixit, Ecce, filius tuus
Joseph venit ad to. Et roboravit se Israel, et sedit super lectum.
|
|
3 And Jacob said unto Joseph, God Almighty appeared
unto me at Luz in the land of Canaan, and blessed me,
|
1
Et dixit Jahacob ipsi Joseph, Deus omnipotens apparuit mihi
in Luz in terra Chenaan, et benedixit mihi.
|
|
4 And said unto me, Behold, I will make thee
fruitful, and multiply thee, and I will make of thee a multitude of people;
and will give this land to thy seed after thee (for) an everlasting
possession.
|
1
Et dixit ad me, Ecce, ego crescere facio to, et multiplicabo
to, et ponam to in coetum populorum, et dabo terram hanc semini tuo post to
in haereditatem perpetuam.
|
|
5 And now thy two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, which
were born unto thee in the land of Egypt before I came unto thee into Egypt, (are)
mine; as Reuben and Simeon, they shall be mine.
|
1
Et nune duo filii tui, qui nati sunt tibi in terra Aegypti,
antequam venirem ad to in Aegyptum, mei sunt Ephraim et Menasseh, sicut
Reuben et Simhon erunt mei.
|
|
6 And thy issue, which thou begettest after them,
shall be thine, (and) shall be called after the name of their brethren
in their inheritance.
|
1
Verum liberi tui, quos generabis post eos, tui erunt: secundum
nomen fratrum suorum vocabuntur in haereditate sua.
|
|
7 And as for me, when I came from Padan, Rachel
died by me in the land of Canaan in the way, when yet (there was) but a
little way to come unto Ephrath: and I buried her there in the way of Ephrath;
the same (is) Bethlehem.
|
1
Porro me veniente e Padan, mortua est mihi Rachel in terra
Chenaan in via, quum adhuc esset milliare terrae ad veniendum in Ephrath: et
sepelivi eam in via Ephrath, ipsa est Bethlehem.
|
|
8 And Israel beheld Joseph’s sons, and said, Who (are)
these?
|
1
Et vidit Israel filios Joseph, et dixit, Cujus sunt isti?
|
|
9 And Joseph said unto his father, They (are)
my sons, whom God hath given me in this (place). And he said, Bring them, I
pray thee, unto me, and I will bless them.
|
1
Et dixit Joseph patri suo, Filii mei sunt quos dedit mihi
Deus hic. Et dixit, Duc eos quaeso ad me, et benedicam eis.
|
|
10 Now the eyes of Israel were dim for age, (so
that) he could not see. And he brought them near unto him; and he kissed
them, and embraced them.
|
1
(Oculi enim Israel graves erant propter senectutem, nec
poterat videre) et accedere fecit eos ad illum, et osculatus est eos, et
amplexatus est eos.
|
|
11 And Israel said unto Joseph, I had not thought
to see thy face: and, lo, God hath shewed me also thy seed.
|
1
Et dixit Israel ad Joseph, Videre faciem tuam non putabam,
et ecce, videre fecit me Deus etiam semen tuum.
|
|
12 And Joseph brought them out from between his
knees, and he bowed himself with his face to the earth.
|
1
Eduxit itaque Joseph eos a genibus suis, et incurvavit se in
faciem suam super terram.
|
|
13 And Joseph took them both, Ephraim in his right
hand toward Israel’s left hand, and Manasseh in his left hand toward Israel’s
right hand, and brought (them) near unto him.
|
1
Et tulit Joseph ambos ipsos, Ephriam ad dexteram suam, a
sinistra Israel, et Menasseh ad sinistram suam, a dextra israel: accedere in
quam fecit ad eum.
|
|
14 And Israel stretched out his right hand, and
laid (it) upon Ephraim’s head, who (was) the younger, and his
left hand upon Manasseh’s head, guiding his hands wittingly; for Manasseh (was)
the firstborn.
|
1
Et extendit Israel dexteram suam, et posuit super caput
Ephraim, qui erat minor: et sinistram suam super caput Menasseh: consulto
dirigens manus suas, quum Menasseh esset primogenitus.
|
|
15 And he blessed Joseph, and said, God, before
whom my fathers Abraham and Isaac did walk, the God which fed me all my life
long unto this day,
|
1
Et benedixit ipsi Joseph, et dixit, Deus, in cujus conspectu
ambulaverunt patres mei Abraham et Ishac, Deus qui pascit me ab aetate mea
usque ad diem hanc,
|
|
16 The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless
the lads; and let my name be named on them, and the name of my fathers
Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the
earth.
|
1
Angelus qui redemit me ab omni malo, benedicat pueris: et
vocetur in eis nomen meum, et nomen patrum meorum Abraham et Ishac, et instar
piscium sint in multitudinem in medio terrae.
|
|
17 And when Joseph saw that his father laid his
right hand upon the head of Ephraim, it displeased him: and he held up his father’s
hand, to remove it from Ephraim’s head unto Manasseh’s head.
|
1
Vidit autem Joseph, quod poneret pater suus manum dexteram
suam super caput Ephraim, et displicuit in oculis ejus, et sustentavit manum
patris sui, ut removeret eam a capite Ephraim, super caput Menasseh.
|
|
18 And Joseph said unto his father, Not so, my
father: for this (is) the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head.
|
1
Et dixit Joseph patri suo, Non sic, pater mi: quia iste est
primogenitus, pone dexteram tuam super caput ejus.
|
|
19 And his father refused, and said, I know (it),
my son, I know (it): he also shall become a people, and he also shall
be great: but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his
seed shall become a multitude of nations.
|
1
Verum renuit pater ejus, et dixit, Novi, fili mi, novi,
etiam ipse erit in populum, et etiam ipse crescet: et tamen frater ejus minor
crescet magis quam ipse, et semen ejus erit plenitudo Gentium.
|
|
20 And he blessed them that day, saying, In thee
shall Israel bless, saying, God make thee as Ephraim and as Manasseh: and he
set Ephraim before Manasseh.
|
1
Et benedixit eis in die ipsa, dicendo, In to benedicet
Israel, dicendo, Ponat to Deus sicut Ephriam et Menasseh: et posuit Ephraim
ante Menasseh.
|
|
21 And Israel said unto Joseph, Behold, I die: but
God shall be with you, and bring you again unto the land of your fathers.
|
1
Et dixit Israel ad Joseph, Ecce, ego morior: et erit Deus
vobiscum, et redire faciet vos ad terram patrum vestorum.
|
|
22 Moreover I have given to thee one portion above
thy brethren, which I took out of the hand of the Amorite with my sword and
with my bow.
|
22. Ego autem dedi tibi partem unam super fratres
tuos, quam cepi e manu Emoraei gladio meo, et arcu meo.
|
1. After these things. Moses now passes to the last act of Jacob’s life, which,
as we shall see, was especially worthy of remembrance. For, since he knew that
he was invested by God with no common character, in being made the father of
the fathers of the Church, he fulfilled, in the immediate prospect of death,
the prophetic office, respecting the future state of the Church, which had been
enjoined upon him. Private persons arrange their domestic affairs by their last
wills; but very different was the method pursued by this holy man, with whom
God had established his covenant, with this annexed condition, that the
succession of grace should flow down to his posterity. But before I enter fully
on the consideration of this subject, these two things are to be observed, to
which Moses briefly alludes: first, that Joseph, being informed of his father’s
sickness, immediately went to see him; and, secondly, that Jacob, having heard
of his arrival, attempted to raise his feeble and trembling body, for the sake
of doing him honor. Certainly, the reason why Joseph was so desirous of seeing
his father, and so prompt to discharge all the other duties of filial piety,
was, that he regarded it as a greater privilege to be a son of Jacob, than to
preside over a hundred kingdoms. For, in bringing his sons with him, he acted
as if he would emancipate them from the country in which they had been born,
and restore them to their own stock. For they could not be reckoned among the
progeny of Abraham, without rendering themselves detested by the Egyptians.
Nevertheless, Joseph prefers that reproach for them, to every kind of wealth
and glory, if they may but become one with the sacred body of the Church. His
father, however, rising before him, pays him becoming honor, for the kindness received
at his hand. Meanwhile, by so doing, he fulfils his part in the prediction,
which before had inflamed his sons with rage; lest his constituting Ephraim and
Manasseh the heads of two tribes, should seem grievous and offensive to his
sons.
3. And Jacob said unto
Joseph. The design of the holy man was to
withdraw his son from the wealth and honors of Egypt, and to reunite him to the
holy race, from which he had been, for a little while, separated. Moreover, he
neither proudly boasts of his own excellence, nor of his present riches, nor of
his power, for the sake of inducing his son to comply with his wishes; but
simply sets before him the covenant of God. So also it is right, that the grace
of adoption, as soon as it is offered to us, should, by filling our thoughts,
extinguish our desire for everything splendid and costly in the world. This
passage is, doubtless, remarkable. Joseph was possessed of the most exalted
dignity; he foresees that the most excellent nobility would pass, through the
memory of his name, to his posterity: he is able to leave them an ample
patrimony: nor would it be difficult so to advance them in royal favor, that
they might obtain rank among the nobles of the kingdom. Too many examples show
how easy it is not only to be caught, but altogether fascinated, by such
allurements. Yea, the greater part know, by their own experience, that, as soon
as the least ray of hope beams upon us, from the world, we are torn away from
the Lord, and alienated from the pursuit of the heavenly life. If a very few
drops thus inebriate our flesh, how dangerous is it to drink from the full
bowl? But to all the riches and honors of Egypt, Jacob opposes the vision in
which God had adopted himself and his race, as his own people. Whenever,
therefore, Satan shall try to entangle us with the allurements of the world,
that he may draw us away from heaven, let us remember for what end we are
called; in order that, in comparison with the inestimable treasure of eternal
life, all that the flesh would otherwise prefer, may become loathsome. For, if
holy Joseph formerly held an obscure vision in such esteem, that, for this sole
object, forgetting Egypt, he gladly passed over to the despised flock of the
Church; how shameful, at this day, is our folly, how vile our stupor, how
detestable our ingratitude, if, at least, we are not equally affected, when our
heavenly Father, having opened the gate of his kingdom, with unutterable
sweetness invites us to himself? At the same time, however, we must observe,
that holy Jacob does not obtrude vain imaginations, for the purpose of alluring
his son; but places before him the sure promise of God, on which he may safely
rely. Whence we are taught, that our faith is not rightly founded on anything
except the sole word of God; and also, that this is a sufficiently firm support
of faith, to prevent it from ever being shaken or overthrown by any devices
whatever. Wherefore, whenever Satan attempts to draw us hither and thither by
his enticements, let us learn to turn our minds to the word of God, and so
firmly to rely upon its hidden blessings, that, with a lofty spirit, we may
spurn those things which the flesh now sees and touches. Jacob says that God
appeared to him in the land of Canaan, in order that Joseph, aspiring after
that land, might become alienated in the affection of his heart from the
kingdom of Egypt.
And blessed me. In this place the word blessed does not signify the
present effect or manifestation of a happy life, in the way in which the Lord
is sometimes said to bless his people, when he indeed declares, by the favor
with which he follows them, that he openly makes them happy, because they are
received under his protection. But Jacob regards himself as blessed, because
he, having embraced the grace promised to him, does not doubt of its effect.
And, therefore, I take what immediately follows; namely, I will make thee fruitful,
etc., as explanatory of what precedes. Now
the Lord promised that he would cause an assembly of nations to descend from
him: because thirteen tribes, of which the whole body of the nation consisted,
were, in a sense, so many nations. But since this was nothing more than a
prelude to that greatness which should afterwards follow, when God, having
scattered seed over the whole world, should gather together a church for
himself, out of all nations; we may, while we recognize the accomplishment of
the benediction under the old dispensation, yet allow that it refers to
something greater. When therefore the people increased to so great a multitude,
and thirteen populous tribes flowed from the twelve patriarchs, Jacob began
already to grow to an assembly of nations. But from the time that the spiritual
Israel was diffused through all quarters of the world, and various nations were
congregated into one Church, this multiplication tended towards its completion.
Wherefore, it is no wonder that holy Jacob should so highly estimate this most
distinguished mark of divine favor, though, indeed, it was deeply hidden from
carnal perception. But inasmuch as the Lord had held him long in suspense,
profane men have said, that the old man was in his dotage. Few indeed are to be
found, in this age, like Joseph, who disregarding the enjoyment of pleasures
which are at hand, yield entire submission to the plain declaration of God’s
word. But as Jacob, relying in confidence on invisible grace, had overcome
every kind of temptation: so now his son, and the true heir of his faith,
regards with reverence the oracles of the Lord; esteeming more highly the
promise which he was persuaded had come down from heaven, though it was in the
form of a dream, than all the riches of Egypt which he enjoyed.
For an everlasting
possession. We have elsewhere shown the
meaning of this expression: namely, that the Israelites should be perpetual
heirs of the land until the coming of Christ, by which the world was renewed.
The Hebrew word µlw[ (olam) is by some taken merely for a long time,
by others for eternity: but seeing that Christ prolongs, to the end of
time, the grace which was previously shadowed forth to the patriarchs; the
phrase, in my judgment, refers to eternity. For that portion of land was
promised to the ancient people of God, until the renovation introduced by
Christ: and now, ever since the Lord has assigned the whole world to his
people, a fuller fruition of the inheritance belongs to us.
5. And now thy two sons. Jacob confers on his son the special privilege, that he,
being one, should constitute two chiefs; that is, that his two sons should
succeed to an equal right with their uncles, as if they had been heirs in the
first degree. But what is this! that a decrepit old man assigns to his
grandchildren, as a royal patrimony, a sixth part of the land in which he had
entered as a stranger, and from which now again he is an exile! Who would not
have said that he was dealing in fables? It is a common proverb, that no one
can give what he has not. What, therefore, did it profit Joseph to be
constituted, by an imaginary title, lord of that land, in which the donor of it
was scarcely permitted to drink the very water he had dug for with greatlabour,
and from which, at length, famine expelled him? But it hence appears with what
firm faith the holy fathers relied upon the word of the Lord, seeing they chose
rather to depend upon his lips, than to possess a fixed habitation in the land.
Jacob is dying an exile in Egypt; and meanwhile, calls away the governor of
Egypt from his dignity into exile, that he may be well and happy. Joseph,
because he acknowledges his father as a prophet of God, who utters no
inventions of his own, esteems as highly the dominion offered to him, which has
never yet become apparent, as if it were already in his possession. Moreover,
that Jacob commands the other sons of Joseph, (if there should be any,) to be
reckoned in the families of these two brothers, is as if he directed them to be
adopted by the two whom he adopts to himself.
7. And as for me, when I
came from Padan. He mentions the death and
burial of his wife Rachel, in order that the name of his mother might prove a
stimulus to the mind of Joseph. For since all the sons of Jacob had sprung from
Syria, it was not a little to the purpose, that they should be thoroughly
acquainted with the history which we have before considered, namely, that their
father, returning into the land of Canaan, by the command and under the
protection of God, brought his wives with him. For if it was not grievous to
women, to leave their father, and to journey into a distant land, their example
ought to be no slight inducement to their sons to bid farewell to Egypt; and at
the command of the same God, strenuously prepare themselves for taking
possession of the land of Canaan.
8. And Israel beheld
Joseph’s sons. I have no doubt that he had
inquired concerning the youths, before he called them his heirs. But in the
narration of Moses there is a hysteron proteron. And in the answer of
Joseph we observe, what we have elsewhere alluded to, that the fruit of the
womb is not born by chance, but is to be reckoned among the precious gifts of
God. This confession indeed finds a ready utterance from the tongues of all;
but there are few who heartily acknowledge that their seed has been given them
by God. And hence a large proportion of man’s offspring becomes continually
more and more degenerate: because the ingratitude of the world renders it
unable to perceive the effect of the blessings of God. We must now briefly
consider the design of Moses: which was to show that a solemn symbol was
interposed, by which the adoption might be ratified. Jacob puts his hands upon
his grandsons; for what end? Truly to prove that he gave them a place among his
sons: and thus constitutes Joseph who was one, into two chiefs.
For this was not his wish as a private person; according to the manner in which
fathers and grandfathers are wont to pray for prosperity to their descendants:
but a divine authority suggested it, as was afterwards proved by the event.
Therefore he commands them to be brought near to him, that he might confer on
them a new honor, as if he had been appointed the dispenser of it by the Lord;
and Joseph, on the other hand, begins with adoration, giving thanks to God.
12. And Joseph brought them out. Moses explains more fully what he had touched upon in a
single word. Joseph brings forth his sons from his own lap to his father’s
knees, not only for the sake of honor, but that he may present them to receive
a blessing from the prophet of God; for he was certainly persuaded, that holy
Jacob did not desire to embrace his grandsons after the common manner of men;
but inasmuch as he was the interpreter of God, he wished to impart to them the
blessing deposited with himself. And although, in dividing the land of Canaan,
he assigned them equal portions with his sons, yet the imposition of his hands
had respect to something higher; namely, that they should be two of the
patriarchs of the Church, and should hold an honorable preeminence in the
spiritual kingdom of God.
14. And Israel stretched out his right hand. Seeing his eyes were dim with age, so that he could not,
by looking, discern which was the elder, he yet intentionally placed his hands
across. And therefore Moses says that he guided
his hands wittingly, because he did not
rashly put them forth, nor transfer them from one youth to the other for the
sake of feeling them: but using judgment, he purposely directed his right hand
to Ephraim who was the younger: but placed his left hand on the first-born.
Whence we gather that the Holy Spirit was the director of this act, who
irradiated the mind of the holy man, and caused him to see more correctly, than
those who were the most clear-sighted, into the nature of this symbolical act.
I shall avoid saying more, because we shall be able to inquire into it from
other passages.
15. God before whom.
Although Jacob knew that a dispensation of the grace of God was committed to
him, in order that he might effectual)y bless his grandchildren; yet he
arrogates nothing to himself, but suppliantly resorts to prayer, lest he
should, in the least degree, detract from the glory of God. For as he was the
legitimate administrator of the blessing, so it behaved him to acknowledge God
as its sole Author. And hence a common rule is to be deduced for all the
ministers and pastors of the Church. For though they are not only called
witnesses of celestial grace, but are also entrusted with the dispensation of
spiritual gifts; yet when they are compared with God, they are nothing; because
he alone contains all things within himself. Wherefore let them learn willingly
to keep their own place, lest they should obscure the name of God. And truly,
since the Lord, by no means, appoints his ministers, with the intention of
derogating from his own power; therefore, mortal man cannot, without sacrilege,
desire to seem anything separate from God. In the words of Jacob we must note,
first, that he invokes God, in whose sight his fathers Abraham and Isaac had
walked: for since the blessing depended upon the covenant entered into with
them, it was necessary that their faith should be an intervening link between
them and their descendants. God had chosen them and their posterity for a
people unto himself: but the promise was efficacious for this reason, because,
being apprehended by faith, it had taken a lively root. And thus it came to
pass, that they transmitted the light of succession to Jacob himself. We now
see that he does not bring forward, in vain, or unseasonably, that faith of the
fathers, without which he would not have been a legitimate successor of grace,
by the covenant of God: not that Abraham and Isaac had acquired so great an
honor for themselves, and their posterity; or were, in themselves, so
excellent; but because the Lord seals and sanctions by faith, those benefits
which he promises us, so that they shall not fail.
The God which fed me. Jacob now descends to his own feelings, and states that
from his youth he had constantly experienced, in various ways, the divine favor
towards him. He had before made the knowledge of God received through his word,
and the faith of his fathers, the basis of the blessing he pronounces; he now
adds another confirmation from experience itself; as if he would say, that he
was not pronouncing a blessing which consisted in an empty sound of words, but
one of which he had himself enjoyed the fruit, all his life long. Now though
God causes his sun to shine indiscriminately on the good and evil, and feeds
unbelievers as well as believers: yet because he affords, only to the latter,
the peculiar sense of his paternal love in the use of his gifts, Jacob rightly
uses this as a reason for the confirmation of his faith, that he had always
been protected by the help of God. Unbelievers are fed, even to the full, by
the liberality of God: but they gorge themselves, like swine, which, while
acorns are falling for them from the trees, yet have their snouts fixed to the
earth. But in God’s benefits this is the principal thing, that they are pledges
or tokens of his paternal love towards us. Jacob, therefore, from the sense of
piety, with which the children of God are endued, rightly adduces, as proof of
the promised grace, whatever good things God had bestowed upon him; as if he
would say, that he himself was a decisive example to show how truly and
faithfully the Lord had engaged by covenant to be a father to the children of
Abraham. Let us also learn hence, carefully to consider and meditate upon
whatever benefits we receive from the hand of God, that they may prove so many
supports for the confirmation of our faith. The best method of seeking God is
to begin at his word; after this, (if I may so speak,) experimental knowledge
is added. Now whereas, in this place, the singular gratitude of the holy man is
conspicuous; yet this circumstance adds to his honor, that, while involved in
manifold sufferings, by which he was almost borne down, he celebrates the
continual goodness of God. For although, by the rare and wonderful power of
God, he had been, in an extraordinary manner, delivered from many dangers; yet
it was a mark of an exalted and courageous mind, to be able to surmount so many
and so great obstacles, to fly on the wings of faith to the goodness of God,
and instead of being overwhelmed by a mass of evils, to perceive the same
goodness in the thickest darkness.
16. The Angel which redeemed me. He so joins the Angel to God as to make him his equal.
Truly he offers him divine worship, and asks the same things from him as from
God. If this be understood indifferently of any angel what ever, the sentence
is absurd. Nay, rather, as Jacob himself sustains the name and character of
God, in blessing his son, ft644 he is superior, in this respect, to the angels. Wherefore
it is necessary that Christ should be here meant, who does not bear in vain the
title of Angel, because he had become the perpetual Mediator. And Paul
testifies that he was the Leader and Guide of the journey of his ancient
people. (1 Corinthians 10:4.) He had not yet indeed been sent by the
Father, to approach more nearly to us by taking our flesh, but because he was
always the bond of connection between God and man, and because God formally
manifested himself in no other way than through him, he is properly called the
Angel. To which may be added, that the faith of the fathers was always fixed on
his future mission. He was therefore the Angel, because even then he poured
forth his rays, that the saints might approach God, through him, as Mediator.
For there was always so wide a distance between God and men, that, without a
mediator; there could be no communication. Nevertheless though Christ appeared
in the form of an angel, we must remember what the Apostle says to the Hebrews,
(Hebrews 2:16,) that “he took not on him the nature of
angels,” so as to become one of them, in the manner in which he truly
became man; for even when angels put on human bodies, they did not, on
that account, become men. Now since we are taught, in these words, that the
peculiar office of Christ is to defend us and to deliver us from all evil, let
us take heed not to bury this grace in impious oblivion: yea, seeing that now
it is more clearly exhibited to us, than formerly to the saints under the law,
since Christ openly declares that the faithful are committed to his care, that
not one of them might perish, (John 17:12,) so much the more ought it to flourish in our
hearts, both that it may be highly celebrated by us with suitable praise, and
that it may stir us up to seek this guardianship of our best Protector. And
this is exceedingly necessary for us; for if we reflect how many dangers
surround us, that we scarcely pass a day without being delivered from a
thousand deaths; whence does this arise, except from that care which is taken
of us, by the Son of God, who has received us under his protection, from the
hand of his Father.
And let my name be named
on them. This is a mark of the adoption
before mentioned: for he puts his name upon them, that they may obtain a place
among the patriarchs. Indeed the Hebrew phrase signifies nothing else than to
be reckoned among the family of Jacob. Thus the name of the husband is said to
be called upon the wife, (Isaiah 4:1,) because the wife borrows the name from the
head to which she is subject. So much the more ridiculous is the ignorance of
the Papists, who would prove hence that the dead are to be invoked in prayers.
Jacob, say they, desired after his death to be invoked by his posterity. What!
that being prayed to, he might bring them succor; and not — according to the
plain intention of the speaker — that Ephraim and Manasseh might be added to
the society of the patriarchs, to constitute two tribes of the holy people!
Moreover it is wonderful, that the Papists, leaving under this pretext framed
for themselves innumerable patrons, should have passed over Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob, as unworthy of the office. But the Lord, by this brutish stupor, has
avenged their impious profanation of his name. What Jacob adds in the next
clause, namely, that they should grow into a multitude, ft645 refers also
to the same promise. The sum amounts to this, that the Lord would complete in
them, what he had promised to the patriarchs.
17. And when Joseph saw.
Because by crossing his arms, Jacob had so placed his hands as to put his left
hand upon the head of the first-born, Joseph wished to correct this proceeding,
as if it had been a mistake. He thought that the error arose from dimness of
vision; but his father followed the Spirit of God as his secret guide, in order
that he might transfer the title of honor, which nature had conferred upon the
elder to the younger. For, as he did not rashly assume to himself the office of
conveying the blessing; so was it not lawful for him to attempt anything
according to his own will. And at length it was evident by the event, that
whatever he had done had been dictated to him from heaven. Whereas Joseph took
it amiss, that Manasseh, who by the right of nature was first, should be cast
down to the second place, this feeling arose from faith and from holy reverence
for the prophetic office. For he would easily have borne to see him make a
mistake in the order of embracing the youths; if he had not known that his
father; as a minister of divine grace, so far from acting a futile part, was
but pronouncing on earth what God would ratify in heaven. Yet he errs in
binding the grace of God to the accustomed order of nature: as if the Lord did
not often purposely change the law of nature, to teach us that what he freely
confers upon us, is entirely the result of his own will. If God were rendering
to every one his due, a certain rule might properly be applied to the
distribution of his favors; but since he owes no one anything, he is free to
confer gifts at his own pleasure. More especially, lest any one should glory in
the flesh, he designedly illustrates his own free mercy, in choosing those who
had no worthiness of their own. What shall we say was the cause, why he raised
Ephraim above his own brother, to whom, according to usage, he was inferior? If
any one should suppose that Ephraim had some hidden seed of excellence, he not
only vainly trifles, but impiously perverts the counsel of God. For since God
derives from himself and from his own liberality, the cause, why he prefers one
of the two to the other: he confers the honor upon the younger, for the purpose
of showing that he is bound by no claims of human merit; but that he
distributes his gifts freely, as it seems good unto him. And while this liberty
of God is extended to every kind of good, it yet shines the most clearly in the
first adoption, whereby he predestinates to himself, those whom he sees fit,
out of the ruined mass. Wherefore, be it our part to leave to God his whole
power untouched, and if at any time, our carnal sense rebels, let us know that
none are more truly wise than they who are willing to account themselves blind,
when contemplating the wonderful dealings of God, in order that they may trace
the cause of any difference he makes, to himself alone. We have seen
above, that the eyes of Jacob were dim: but in crossing his arms, with apparent
negligence, in order to comply with God’s purpose of election, he is more
clear-sighted than his son Joseph, who, according to the sense of the flesh,
inquires with too much acuteness. They who insanely imagine that this judgment
was formed from a view of their works, sufficiently declare, by this one thing,
that they do not hold the first rudiments of faith. For either the adoption
common both to Manasseh and to Ephraim, was a free gift, or a reward of debt.
Concerning this second supposition all ambiguity is removed, by many passages
of Scripture, in which the Lord makes known his goodness, in having freely
loved and chosen his people. Now no one is so ignorant; as not to perceive that
the first place is not assigned to one or the other, according to merit; but is
given gratuitously, since it so pleases the Lord. With regard to the posture of
the hands, the subtlety of certain persons, who conjecture that the mystery of
the cross was included in it, is absurd; for the Lord intended nothing more
than that the crossing of the right hand and the left should indicate a change
in the accustomed order of nature.
19. He also shall become a people. Jacob does not dispute which of the youths shall be the
more worthy; but only pronounces what God had decreed with himself, concerning
each, and, what would take place after a long succession of time. He seeks,
therefore, no causes elsewhere; but contents himself with this one statement,
that Ephraim will be more greatly multiplied than Manasseh. And truly our
dignity is hidden in the counsel of God alone, until, by his vocation, he makes
it manifest what he wills to do with us. Meanwhile, sinful emulation is
forbidden, when he commands Manasseh to be contented with his lot. They are
therefore altogether insane, who hew out dry and perforated cisterns, in
seeking causes of divine adoption; whereas, everywhere, the Scripture defines
in one word, that they are called to salvation whom God has chosen, (Romans
8:29,) and that the primary source of election is his free good pleasure. The
form of the benediction, which is shortly afterwards related, more fully
confirms what I have alluded to, that the grace of God towards both is
commended, in order that Manasseh, considering that more was given to him than
he deserved, might not envy his brother. Moreover, this blessing pronounced on
Ephraim and Manasseh is not to be taken in the same sense as the former, in
which it is said, In thy seed shall all
nations be blessed: but the simple meaning
is, that the grace of God should be so conspicuous towards the two sons of
Joseph, as to furnish the people of Israel with a form by which to express
their good wishes.
21. And Israel said unto Joseph. Jacob repeats what he had said. And truly all his sons,
and especially Joseph and his sons, required something more than one simple
confirmation, in order that they might not fix their abode in Egypt, but might
dwell, in their minds, in the land of Canaan. He mentions his own death, for
the purpose of teaching them that the eternal truth of God by no means depended
on the life of men: as if he had said, my life, seeing it is short and fading,
passes away; but the promise of God, which has no limit, will flourish when I
also am dead. No vision had appeared unto his sons, but God had ordained the
holy old man as the intermediate sponsor of his covenant. He therefore
sedulously fulfills the office enjoined upon him, taking timely precaution that
their faith should not be shaken by his death. So when the Lord delivers his
word to the world by mortal men, although they die, having finished their
course of life according to the flesh; yet the voice of God is not extinguished
with them, but quickens us even at the present day. Therefore Peter writes,
that he will endeavor, that after his decease, the Church may be mindful of the
doctrine committed unto him. (2 Peter 1:15.)
Unto the land of your
fathers. It is not without reason that he
claims for himself and his fathers, the dominion over that land in which they
had always wandered as strangers; for whereas it might seem that the promise of
God had failed, he excites his sons to a good hope, and pronounces, with a
courageous spirit, that land to be his own, in which, at length, he scarcely
obtained a sepulcher, and that only by favor. Whence then was this great
confidence, except that he would accustom his sons, by his example, to have
faith in the word of God? Now this doctrine is also common to us; because we
never rely with sufficient firmness on the word of God, so long as we are led
by our own feelings. Nay, until our faith rises to lay hold on those things
which are removed afar off, we know not what it is to set our seal to the word
of God.
22. I have given to thee one portion. In order to increase the confidence of his son Joseph,
Jacob here assigns him a portion beyondhis proper lot. Some expound the passage
otherwise; as if he called him a double heir in his two sons, thus honoring him
with one portion more than the rest. But there is no doubt that he means a
certain territory. And John, (John 4:5,) removes all controversy; for, speaking of the
field adjoining Sychar, which before was called Shechem, says, it was that
which Jacob gave to his son Joseph. And, in the last chapter of Joshua, (Joshua
24:32,) it is said to have come into the possession of the sons of Joseph. But
in the word µkç (shechem,) which among the Hebrews signifies a part,
allusion is made to the proper name of the place. But here a question arises;
how can he say that he had obtained the field by his sword and by his bow,
which he had purchased with money, as is stated before, (Genesis
33:19,) and is again recorded in the above mentioned chapter of Joshua? Seeing,
however, that only a small portion of the field, where he might pitch his
tents, was bought, I do not doubt that here he comprised a much greater space.
For we may easily calculate, from the price, how small a portion of land he
possessed, before the destruction of the city. He gives, therefore, now to his
son Joseph, not only the place of his tent, which had cost a hundred pieces of
silver, but the field which had been the common of the city of Sychar. But it
remains to inquire how he may be said to have obtained it by his sword, whereas
the inhabitants had been wickedly and cruelly slain by Simon and Levi. How then
could it be acquired by the right of conquest, from those against whom war had
been unjustly brought; or rather, against whom, without any war, the most cruel
perfidy had been practiced? Jerome resorts to allegory, saying that the field
was obtained by money, which is called strength, or justice. Others suppose a
prolepsis, as if Jacob was speaking of a future acquisition of the land: a
meaning which, though I do not reject, seems yet somewhat forced. I rather
incline to this interpretation: first, that he wished to testify that he had
taken nothing by means of his two sons Simon and Levi; who, having raged like
robbers, were not lawful conquerors, and had never obtained a single foot of land,
after the perpetration of the slaughter. For, so far were they from gaining
anything, that they compelled their father to fly; nor would escape have been
possible, unless they had been delivered by miracle. When, however, Jacob
strips them of their empty title, he transfers this right of victory to
himself, as being divinely granted to him. For though he always held their
wickedness in abhorrence, and will show his detestation of it in the next
chapter Genesis 49:1; yet, because they had armed his whole
household, they fought as under his auspices. Gladly would he have preserved
the citizens of Shechem, a design which he was not able to accomplish; yet he
appropriates to himself the land left empty and deserted by their destruction,
because, for his sake, God had spared the murderers. ft646
Footnotes
ft644 In denedicendo filio. It appears that thought the singular number
is used, yet reference is made to the two grandsons of Jacob. — Ed.
ft645 wgdy, (yedegu,) Ainsworth translates the passage, “let them
increase like fish into a multitude.” The
Hebrew word for fish is from the above root, because of their prolific
property; and consequently the use of such a term naturally suggests the notion
of an extraordinary increase. Thus
the Chaldee paraphrase adds, “like the fishes of the sea.” Hence, in the time of Moses there were
85,200 men of war descended from Joseph, a greater number than from any other
of Jacob’s sons. See Ainsworth. —
Ed.
ft646 Perhaps this interpretation of a
confessedly obscure passage, will be deemed rather ingenious than solid. It is supposed by many, that Jacob refers to
some transaction of which no record is preserved. He may, like Abraham, on some occasion, have armed his household
to recover from the hands of the Amorites the field of Sheehem, which he had
previously purchased. But the
whole must be left in hopeless obscurity. Ainsworth
thinks that Jacob is speaking proleptically, and representing the future
conduct of his children under Joshua, whose sword and bow he here calls his
own. But this seems far-fetched. The Chaldee interpretation, that the sword
and bow are figuratively used for prayer and supplication, is still more
improbable. — Ed.
<<
Top
Contents
>>
|