|
GraciousCall.org - Calvin's Commentary on Joshua 1-18
<<
Top
Contents
>>
CHAPTER 14
|
Joshua 14:1-15
|
|
1. And these are the
countries which the children of Israel inherited in the land of Canaan,
which Eleazar the priest, and Joshua the son of Nun, and the heads of the
fathers of the tribes of the children of Israel, distributed for inheritance
to them.
|
1. Haec sunt quae in haereditatem
acceperunt filii Israel in terra Chanaan, quae illis tradiderunt in
haereditatem Eleazar sacerdos, et Josue filius Nun, et capita tribuum
filiorum Israel.
|
|
2. By lot was
their inheritance, as the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses, for the nine
tribes, and for the half tribe.
|
2. Per sortem
haereditatis eorum, sicut praeceperat Jehova per manum Mosis, ut daret novem
tribubus, et dimidiae tribui.
|
|
3. For Moses had
given the inheritance of two tribes and an half tribe on the other side
Jordan: but unto the Levites he gave none inheritance among them.
|
3. Dederat enim
Moses duabustribubus, et dimidiae tribui citra Jordanem: Levitis autem non
dederat haereditatem in medio eorum.
|
|
4. For the children
of Joseph were two tribes, Manasseh and Ephraim: therefore they gave no part
unto the Levites in the land, save cities to dwell in, with their
suburbs for their cattle and for their substance.
|
4. Fuerunt enim filii
Joseph duae tribus Manasse et Ephraim: ideo non dederunt partem Levitis in
terra praeter urbes ad habitandum, et suburbana earum pro armentis et
gregibus ipsorum.
|
|
5. As the LORD
commanded Moses, so the children of Israel did, and they divided the land.
|
5. Quemadmodum
praeceperat Moses sic fecerunt filii Israel, et diviserunt terram.
|
|
6. Then the
children of Judah came unto Joshua in Gilgal: and Caleb the son of Jephunneh
the Kenezite said unto him, Thou knowest the thing that the LORD said unto
Moses the man of God concerning me and thee in Kadeshbarnea.
|
6. Accesserunt
autem filii Juda ad Josuam in Gilgal, dixitque ad eum Caleb filius Jephune
Kenisaeus, Tu nosti verbum quod loquutus est Jehova ad Mosen virum Dei de me,
et de te, in Cades-barnea:
|
|
7. Forty years old was
I when Moses the servant of the LORD sent me from Kadeshbarnea to espy out
the land; and I brought him word again as it was in mine heart.
|
7. Quadragenarius
eram quando misit me Moses servus Jehovae de Cades-barnea ad explorandam
terram, et retuli ei rem sicuti erat in corde meo.
|
|
8. Nevertheless my
brethren that went up with me made the heart of the people melt: but I wholly
followed the LORD my God.
|
8. Et quum fratres
mei qui descenderant mecum dissolverent cor populi, ego perseveranter
sequutus sum Jehovam Deum meum.
|
|
9. And Moses swear
on that day, saying, Surely the land whereon thy feet have trodden shall be
thine inheritance, and thy children’s for ever, because thou has wholly followed
the LORD my God.
|
9. Et juravit Moses
illo die, dicendo, Si non terra quam calcavit pes tuus, tua erit in
haereditatem et filiis tuis in aeternum, quia perseveranter sequutus es
Jehovam Deum meum.
|
|
10. And now,
behold, the LORD has kept me alive, as he said, these forty and five years,
even since the LORD spoke this word unto Moses, while the children of
Israel wandered in the wilderness: and now, lo, I am this day
fourscore and five years old.
|
10. Nunc autem Jehova
concessit mihi vitam sicuti dixerat. Jam quadraginta quinque anni sunt, ex
quo tempore pronunciavit Jehova hanc rem Mosi, ex quo ambulavit Israel per
desertum: et nunc quidem hodie sum quinque et octoginta annorum.
|
|
11. As yet I am
as strong this day as I was in the day that Moses sent me: as my
strength was then, even so is my strength now, for war, both to
go out, and to come in.
|
11. Et adhuc sum
hodie vegetus ut eo die, quo misit me Moses: quantus erat tunc vigor meus,
tantus, hodie est vigor meus ad praelium, et ad exeundum, et ad ingrediendum:
|
|
12. Now therefore
give me this mountain, whereof the LORD spoke in that day; for thou heardest
in that day how the Anakims were there, and that the cities were
great and fenced: if so be the LORD will be with me, then I
shall be able to drive them out, as the LORD said.
|
12. Nunc ergo da
mihi montem istum, ut loquutus est Jehova eo die. Tu enim audivisit eo die
quod Anakim sint ibi, et urbes magnae et munitae: forte Jehova erit mecum, et
expellam eos quemadmodum dixit Jehova.
|
|
13. And Joshua blessed
him, and gave unto Caleb the son of Jephunneh Hebron for an inheritance.
|
13. Et benedixit ei
Josue, deditque Hebron ipsi Caleb filio Jephune in haereditatem.
|
|
14. Hebron
therefore became the inheritance of Caleb the son of Jephunneh the Kenezite
unto this day, because that he wholly followed the LORD God of Israel.
|
14. Idcirco fuit Hebron
ipsuis Caleb filii Jephune Kenisaei, in haereditatem, usque ad diem hunc, eo
quod perseveranter sequutus est Jehovam Deum Israel.
|
|
15. And the name of
Hebron before was Kirjatharba; which Arba was a great man among
the Anakims. And the land had rest from war.
|
15. Nomen autem Hebron
antea fuit Ciriath-arba, qui Arba homo magnus inter Anakim fuit: et terra
quievit a bello.
|
1. And these are
the countries, etc He now proceeds to the land of Canaan, from which
nine tribes and a half were to obtain their lots. And he will immediately break
off the thread of the narrative, as we shall see. Yet the transition is
seasonably made from that region whose situation was different, to let the
reader know that the discourse was to be concerning the land of Canaan, which
was to be divided by lot. We have said that Joshua and Eleazar not only divided
what the Israelites had already acquired, but trusting in the promise of God,
confidently included whatever he had promised to his people, just as if they
had been in actual possession of it. We shall see, indeed, that the division
was not all at once made complete, but when the first lot turned up in favor of
Judah, the turns of the others were left in hope.
Here a difficult question arises. How can it be said
that the distribution of the land was made by Joshua, Eleazar, and the princes,
if lots were cast? For the lot is not regulated by the opinion or the will or
the authority of man. Should any one answer, that they took charge and
prevented any fraud from being committed, the difficulty is not removed, nay,
this evasion will be refuted from the context. It is to be known, therefore,
that they were not selected simply to divide the land by lot, but also
afterwards to enlarge or restrict the boundaries of the tribes by giving to each
its due proportion. That this business could not be accomplished by a naked lot
is very apparent. For while, according to human ideas, nothing is more
fortuitous than the result of a lot, it was not known whether God might choose
to place the half tribe of Manasseh where the tribe of Judah obtained its
settlement, or whether Zebulun might not occupy the place of Ephraim. Therefore
they were not at liberty at the outset to proceed farther than to divide the
land into ten districts or provinces. In this way, however, the space belonging
to each would remain indefinite. For had an option been given to each, some
would have chosen to fix themselves in the center, others would have preferred
a quiet locality, while others would have been guided in their choice by the
fertility of the soil, or the climate and beauty of the scenery. But the lot
placed the tribe of Judah, as it were, at the head, while it sent that of
Zebulun away to the seashore, placed the tribe of Benjamin adjacent to that of
Judah, and removed that of Ephraim to a greater distance. In short, the effect
of the lot was that ten divisions fell out from Egypt towards Syria, and from
the north quarter to the Mediterranean Sea, making some neighbors to the
Egyptians, and giving to others maritime positions, to others hilly districts,
to others intervening valleys.
This being understood, the office remaining for the
rulers of the people was to trace out the boundaries on all sides in accordance
with the rules of equity. It remained, therefore, for them to calculate how
many thousand souls there were in every tribe, and to assign more or less space
to each, according to the greatness or the smallness of their numbers. For in
conformity to the divine command, a due proportion was to be observed, and a
larger or narrower district was to be assigned, according as the census which
was taken had ascertained the numbers to be. (Numbers 26) To the judgment of
the princes was it in like manner left to shape the territories, regulating the
length and breadth as circumstances might require. It is necessary also to bear
in mind what is said in Numbers 26, that the ten who are here called heads of
families were appointed to execute this office, not by the suffrages of men,
but by the voice of God. Thus each tribe had its own overseers to prevent
either fraud or violence from being committed. Then it would have been impious
to have any suspicion of those who had been nominated by God. Such is the
manner in which Joshua may be said to have distributed the land, though it was
portioned out by lot.
4. They gave no
part unto the Levites, etc It is here repeated for the third time
with regard to the Levites, that they were not included in the number, so as to
have the portion of a tribe assigned to them; but it is mentioned for a
different purpose, for it is immediately after added, that the sons of Joseph
were divided into two tribes, and were thus privileged to obtain a double
portion. Thus had Jacob prophesied, (Genesis 49) or rather, like an arbiter
appointed by God, he had in this matter preferred the sons of Joseph to the
others. God therefore assumed the Levites to himself as a peculiar inheritance,
and in their stead substituted one of the two families of Joseph.
6. Then the
children of Judah came, etc Here the account which had been begun as
to the partition of the land is broken off to make way for the insertion of a
narrative, namely, that Caleb requested Mount Hebron to be given to him as he
had been promised by Moses. This happened a long time before the people had ceased
from making war, and it became necessary to cast lots. It is stated to be the
fifth year since their entrance into the land, and he does not ask for a
locality to be given up to him which was already subdued and cleared of the
enemy, but in the midst of the noise and heat of warfare, he asks to be
permitted to acquire it by routing and slaying its giants. He only seeks to
provide, that when his valor has subdued the giants, he is not to be defrauded
of the reward of his labor. The method of so providing, is to prevent its being
included in the common lot of a tribe. Accordingly, he does not put forth the
claim by himself alone, but the members of his tribe, the sons of Judah also
concur with him, because the effect of conferring this extraordinary benefit on
one family was so far to make an addition to all. Hence though Caleb alone
speaks, all the tribe whose interest it was that his request should be granted
were present.
I am not clear why the surname of Kenite was given to
Caleb. He is so called also in Numbers 32. I am not unaware of the conjecture
of some expositors, that he was so surnamed from Kenas, because either he
himself or some one of his ancestors dwelt among the Kenites. But I see no
solid foundation for this. What if he gained this title by some illustrious
deed, just as victors sometimes assume a surname from the nations they have
subdued? As the promise had not been inserted into any public record, and
Joshua was the only witness now surviving, he makes his application to him. And
it is probable that when the ten spies made mention of the names of the Anakim,
with the view of terrifying the people, Caleb, to refute their dishonesty,
answered with truth, that when he beheld them on Mount Hebron, they were so far
from being terrible, that he would attack them at his own hand, provided that
on their expulsion he should succeed to their lands; and that on these
conditions Moses ceded to him a habitation in that locality which he should
have acquired by his own prowess.
7. Forty years old
was I, etc He seems to talk of his own virtue in rather loftier
terms than becomes a pious and modest man. But let us remember that, seeing the
thing was in itself invidious and liable to many objections, it stood in need
of special commendation as a means of suppressing envy. He therefore mentions
that he had acted in good faith in bringing back an account of what he had
learned concerning the land. For the expression, “As it was in my heart,”
evidently denotes sincerity, the heart being thus opposed to deceitful words.
It is a ridiculous fiction to imagine that he had said it in his heart, because
from fear of being killed by his companions he had not ventured to mention
anything of the kind by the way. Nothing more is meant than simply this, that
he acted honestly according to the command given him, without gloss or
dissimulation. He enlarges on the merit of his integrity, because though he was
opposed by all his colleagues, with the exception of Joshua, he did not yield
to their malice, nor was dispirited by their iniquitous conspiracy, but
steadfastly pursued his purpose. The words taken in their most literal sense
are, I filled or fulfilled to go after thy God; but the obvious meaning is,
that he was not seduced from a faithful discharge of his duty by the wicked
machination of ten men, however difficult it was to resist them, because he
followed God with inflexible perseverance, feeling perfectly assured that God
was the author of the expedition, from which those perfidious men were
endeavoring to draw off the people.
Let us learn from this passage, first, that unless the
last part corresponds to the first, good beginnings vanish away; secondly, that
constancy is deserving of praise only when we follow God.
9. And Moses swear
on that day, etc Here, then, is one fruit of the embassy honestly
and faithfully performed — to gain possession of an inheritance of which the
whole people is deprived. For although long life is justly accounted one of the
mercies of God, the end proposed by it is here added, viz., that Caleb may
obtain the inheritance which is denied to others. This was no ordinary
privilege. He next extols the faithfulness of God in having prolonged his life,
and not only so, but supplied vigor and strength, so that though he was now
above eighty years of age, he was not a whit feebler than when in the flower of
his youth. Others, too, had a green old age, but they were few in number, and
then in their case there was not added to the even tenor of their days a manly
vigor, remaining wholly unimpaired up to their eighty-fifth year. For he lays
claim not only to the skill and valor of a leader, but also to the physical
strength of a soldier.
He next adds the other offices and actions of his life.
For to go out and in is equivalent in Hebrew to the observance and execution of
all parts of our duty. And this Caleb confirms by fact, when he demands it as
his task to assail and expel the giants. He is not, however, elated by stolid
pride to a confident assurance of victory, but hopes for a prosperous event
from the assistance of God. There seems, indeed, to be an incongruous
expression of doubt in the word Perhaps, as if he were begirding himself
fortuitously for the fight. ft135
Those expositors who think that he is distrusting himself from a feeling of
modesty and considering his own weakness, say something to the point, but do
not say the whole. They certainly omit what is of principal import, viz., that
this Perhaps refers to the common feelings which men would entertain on taking
a view of the actual state of matters.
The first thing necessary is duly to consider what his
design is. Had he asked the gift of a mountain, which he could have seized
without any great exertion, in would have been more difficult to obtain it. But
now when the difficulty of the task is plainly set forth, he gains the favor of
Joshua and the princes, because in assenting to his prayer, they grant him
nothing but the certainty of an arduous, doubtful, and perilous contest.
Knowing, then, that the children of Israel trembled and were in terror at the
very name of the giants, he speaks according to their opinion as of a matter
attended with doubt and uncertainty. As regards himself, the words clearly
demonstrate how far he was from viewing that which had been said to him with a
dubious or vacillating mind. I shall drive them out, he says, as the Lord has
declared. Shall we say that when he utters the declaration of God, he is in
doubt whether or not God will do what he promised? It is quite plain that he
only reminded them how dangerous the business was, in order that he might the
more easily obtain their assent. Although it is not uncommon in Hebrew to
employ this term to denote difficulty merely, without meaning to imply that the
mind is agitated by distrust or disquietude. How very difficult it was to drive
out the giants from that fastness, may be inferred from the fact that the death
of Joshua took place before Caleb ventured to attack them.
13. And Joshua
blessed him, etc He prayed thus earnestly to show the delight he
felt. For it was expedient by way of example to extol his valor, by which
others might be incited to surmount all their fears. For it was just as if he
had gained an eminence from which he could look down upon the giants. The
blessing of Caleb, therefore, includes in it praise which may have the effect
of an exhortation to the people. In the end of the chapter it is said, that the
name of Hebron was Ciriath-Arba, (Kirjath-Arba.) Here it is to be observed,
that it is not the mountain itself that is meant, but the principal city, of
which there is frequent mention in Scripture. It is said to have received the
surname from a giant famous for his stature. And this refutes the imagination
of those expositors who insist that it was so called from having been the
burial-place of four patriarchs — Adam, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
It is plain that Caleb, in making the request, had not
been looking to present ease or private advantage, since he does not aspire to
the place that had been given him till many years after. Wherefore it was no
less the interest of the whole people than of one private family, that that
which as yet depended on the incomprehensible grace of God, and was treasured
up merely in hope, should be bestowed as a special favor. A grant which could
not take effect without a wonderful manifestation of divine agency could
scarcely be invidious.
A question, however, arises. Since Hebron not only
became the portion of the Levites, but was one of the cities of refuge, how
could the grant stand good? If we say that Caleb was contented with other
towns, and resigned his right to the Levites, it is obvious that the difficulty
is not solved, because Caleb is distinctly appointed owner of that city. But if
we reflect that the right of dwelling in the cities was all that was granted to
the Levites, there will be no inconsistency. Meanwhile, no small praise is due
to the moderation of Caleb, who, in a locality made his own by extraordinary
privilege, did not refuse an hospitable reception to the Levites. ft137
From A Translation of Calivn’s Translation
1 These are the
territories which the children of Israel received as an inheritance, in the
land of Canaan, which Eleazar the priest and Joshua the son of Nun, and the
heads of the tribes of the children of Israel, delivered to them, for an
inheritance,
2 By
the lot of their inheritance, as Jehovah had commanded by the hand of Moses, to
give to the nine tribes and the half tribe.
3 For
Moses had given to the two tribes and to the half tribe beyond the Jordan. But
he had not given to the Levites an inheritance in the midst of them.
4 For
the sons of Joseph were the two tribes of Manasseh and Ephraim: accordingly
they did not give a portion to the Levites in the land except cities to dwell
in, and the suburbs of them for their herds and flocks.
5 As
Moses had commanded, so did the children of Israel, and they divided the land.
6 And
the children of Judah came near to Joshua in Gilgal, and Caleb the son of
Jephunneh the Kenezite said to him, Thou knowest the word which Jehovah spoke
to Moses the man of God, concerning me and concerning thee in Cades-barnea.
7 I
was forty years old when Moses the servant of Jehovah sent me from Cades-Barnea
to explore the land, and I reported the matter to him as it was in my heart.
8 And
when my brethren who had come down with me melted the heart of the people, I
perseveringly followed Jehovah my God.
9 And
Moses swear on that day, saying, Surely the land which thy foot has trod shall
be thine for an inheritance, and to thy children for ever, because thou has
perseveringly followed Jehovah thy God.
10 And
now Jehovah has granted me life as he had said. Forty-five years have elapsed
since the time when the Lord declared this matter to Moses, and since Israel
has walked through the desert: and now, indeed, this day am I eighty-five years
of age.
11 And
still am I this day vigorous as on that day on which Moses sent me; as great as
my vigor was then, so great is my vigor this day for battle, both for going out
and coming in.
12 Now, therefore, give
me that mountain, as Jehovah spoke on that day, For thou did hear on that day
that the Anakim are there, and cities great and fortified: perhaps Jehovah will
be with me, and I shall drive them out, as Jehovah said.
13 And
Joshua blessed him, and gave Hebron to Caleb himself the son of Jephunneh for
an inheritance.
14 Therefore has Hebron
belonged to Caleb himself the son of Jephunneh, the Kenezite for an inheritance
unto this day, because he perseveringly followed Jehovah, the God of Israel.
15 Now the name of
Hebron was formerly Ciriath-arba, which Arba was a great man among the Anakim,
and the land rested from war.
Footnotes
ft135French,
“Il est vrai que ce mot Peut estre, qui est une marque ordinaire de
doute, semble estre estrange et ne convenir point, comme s’il se preparoit au
combat a l’adventure;” “It is true, indeed, that this word Perhaps,
which is an ordinary mark of doubt, seems strange and unsuitable, as if he were
preparing himself for the combat at hap-hazard.” — Ed.
ft136Latin,
“Ea munitione.” French, “Cette forteresse si bien munie;” “That stronghold so
well fortified.” — Ed.
ft137According
to the explanation here given, the Levites held Hebron only by a kind of
precarious tenure, dependent on the good will of Caleb, who gave them an
hospitable reception, but might have declined it. It would seem, however, from
other passages, and more particularly from Joshua
20:7, and Joshua
21:9-13, that their right to Hebron was as complete and absolute as that which
they possessed to any of their other cities. Moreover, as these cities were
allocated by lot, or in other words, by divine arrangement, no injustice was
done to Caleb, and it would have been strangely inconsistent with all that we
have previously learned of his conduct and character, had he on this occasion
offered any remonstrance. — Ed.
<<
Top
Contents
>>
|